Thursday, November 12, 2009

"2012" movie review: Roland Emmerich ends the world ... again

“2012” Movie Review -- Remember “Independence Day,” that alien invasion flick with enthusiastic primary effects that made a ton of money? You don’t advert it half as substantially as its director, Roland Emmerich. Because he turned it into a plan for “2012.” 2012 (PG-13) river (158 min.) Directed by Roland Emmerich. With Evangelist Cusack, Amanda Peet, Chiwetel Ejiofor. Now activity in New Jersey. STEPHEN WHITTY’S RATING: TWO STARS Ratings note: The flick contains roughly 6 1000000000 acts of violence. That prototypal flick had a geeky individual hero (Jeff Goldblum), a papa with kinsfolk issues (Will Smith), a courageous chair (Bill Pullman), a unaccompanied wingnut (Randy Quaid), a grouchy person ascendant (Judd Hirsch), a artful canid in danger and lots of international monuments blowing up. This newborn flick has a geeky individual hero (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a papa with kinsfolk issues (John Cusack), a courageous chair (Danny Glover), a unaccompanied wingnut (Woody Harrelson), a grouchy person ascendant (George Segal), a artful canid in danger and lots of international monuments blowing up. Well, there is digit difference. The prototypal flick wasn’t boring. This one, however, which clocks in at substantially over 21/2 disaster-prone hours, is pretty stultifying. Actors say confused lines with deadly seriousness. Exposition is wielded same a sledgehammer. All you can do is sandstone your set and move for the incoming gesture of destruction. 2012-john-cusack.jpgColumbia Pictures/SonyLily Morgan and Evangelist Cusack try to outrun hardship in “2012.” There is one, of course, every half-hour or so â€" the flick hasn’t been so such cursive as plotted on a interpret â€" complete with domestic landmarks and religious icons torn to bits. No Muslim symbols, though; as Emmerich has honestly and gracelessly admitted, he dislikes every religions, but gave Mohammedanism a transfer for fear of a fatwa on his head. Judging by the audience’s reaction at a past screening, he should probably still check his back, meet on generalized principle. The destruction, admittedly, is every state-of-the-art â€" half a century and many technical generations distant from the example “When Worlds Collide.” But it’s every the same. Twice the hero drives a automobile meet digit field aweigh of ever-widening fissures; twice he flies in a form that meet just dodges the looming obstacles ahead. By the midway point, “2012” isn’t meet plagiarizing another movies, it’s plagiarizing itself. The strategy has something to do with a international alignment (predicted by the Mayans, of course) which has someways caused a rapid process in solar flares. This, in turn, has caused neutrinos to mutate into a newborn category of particle and bombard the Earth, where, acting as microwaves, they’ve . . . Yeah, that was where I stopped listening, too. It every sounds most as pat as that lecture most Solarnite in “Plan 9 From Outer Space.” Unfortunately, as the film’s chief power guy, Ejiofor bears the brunt of it, gift long, impassioned speeches in which, more often than not, he has to adjudge that he’s actually been wrong and things are such worsened than he thought. I’ll say. Ejiofor’s a decorous actor, but his calling card on screen â€" in “Talk to Me,” in “Dirty Pretty Things” â€" has ever been displeased sincerity. A flick that features a tidal gesture touch Washington, D.C., is no place for it. What you need is an actor who’s in on the joke â€" modify if it’s a clannish digit he’s distribution with the audience. Cusack is an actor same that; unfortunately, he’s stuck here activity the papa who â€" as in “Independence Day” â€" needs to hit the entire concern literally reaching to an modify to actualise he’s been category of selfish. Glad to hit helped you discover with that chronicle lesson, fella. Makes every the destructive conflagrations worth it. Cusack is pleasant, of course, but the part doesn’t provide him such shack to exhibit his significance of humor. And patch Amanda Peet is sure pretty to look at as his wife, her persona only requires that she unstoppered her eyes panoramic and occasionally shriek “Wait!” If the digit don’t untune themselves, it’s only because they’re so forgettable. As is “2012.” The effects are stupendous, the people are attractive, and there are a couple of nail-biting scenes. But it’s every clog we’ve seen before (and done better), mashed into digit movie. Toward the end, I modify constituted a environs from “The Poseidon Adventure.” Worse, I realized I’d rather be watching “The Poseidon Adventure.” Source - http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2009/11/2012_movie_review.html Tags:2012, 2012 movie, 2012 flick reviews, tum knot flick review, 2012 flick rating, 2012 flick review, check 2012 online free, check 2012 online, check 2012, check 2012 movie, check 2012 flick online free, check 2012 flick online


Yahoo

No comments: